zum Inhalt springen

Current PhD Projects

 

Chinese Courts as Lawmakers

Pilar Czoske

Research Assistant, Institute of East Asian Studies, University of Cologne, pczoske(at)uni-koeln.de

Abstract

This thesis argues that Chinese courts are an integral part of a political-legal system that is based on interacting cycles of varied forms of policy- and law-making and includes a wide range of political and legal actors. Through their various judicial activities, Chinese courts serve as both political actors and law-makers. When adopting reform plans, the Supreme People’s Court functions as a bridge between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the National legislature by specifying party policies and providing a legal framework for the enactment of formal laws. When issuing judicial interpretations, judicial opinions or guiding cases, the courts act as quasi-legislators. The interpretations, opinions and guiding cases are general in nature and are sufficiently precise to allow direct application. In practice, they are applied as though they were legal norms enacted by competent legislative bodies. The courts also act as quasi-legislators when they jointly issue legal documents with other state or party institutions that are then applied as if they were regular legal norms. If such documents are classified as legal norms, law-making processes based on coalition-building among party and state institutions would characterize the interaction between politics and laws within China’s legal system. Operating under the assumption that Chinese courts function as both political and legal actors, this thesis attempts to investigate how the courts are shaping and organizing China’s constitutional and political-legal system through their diverse judicial activities. By issuing reform plans, building law-making coalitions with other state and party institutions and issuing their own judicial interpretations, opinions and guiding cases, the courts construct a framework for the operation of the constitutional political-legal system in China’s one-party state. They redefine the CCP’s role within this system by merging the CCP’s politics with laws and jurisprudence; however, they also specify other legal actors’ roles by interpreting and developing laws and regulations through coalition-building, judicial interpretations, opinions and guiding cases.

 

 

Law Enforcement through Political Campaigns: Taking the ‘Sanfei’ Campaigns as an Example in the Area of Immigration Law

Jasper Habicht

Research Associate, Institute of East Asian Studies, University of Cologne, jasper.habicht(at)uni-koeln.de

Abstract

Due to China’s rapid economic development, the country turned out to be a preferred destination for people from countries of the so-called ‘Global South’. This inflow of surplus low-skilled workers surging into the bigger cities is seen with big concern, especially since many of these migrants do not possess proper documents. In parallel to the revision of the Exit–Entry law that established a rigorous immigration examination and administration system, the police executed several actions against foreigners residing and working illegally in China, so-called ‘sanfei’ campaigns, in different major cities across the country. Campaigns are often considered critical because of their political nature that is likely to circumvent any legal basis. However, recent research has shown that in the last decades campaigns increasingly adhere to legal proceedings and more and more often are used as a means of enforcement of legal norms. In the field of immigration law, different interests clash: On the one hand, illegal activities pose a threat to public security and thus have to be curtailed by appropriate legal rules. Also, campaigns against foreigners are capable to satisfy public xenophobic resentments. On the other hand, foreign workers help to build up trade connections while stricter immigration rules have a chilling effect on foreign investment. This project aims to analyse the role of campaigns in law enforcement in the field of immigration law.

 

 

The Implementation of Fair Trial Rights in the Chinese Criminal Justice System

Alexandra Kaiser 

akaiser1(at)smail.uni-koeln.de

Abstract 

Over the past two decades, China’s criminal justice system experienced a great transformation. Recent legislation protects the rights of citizens of the People’s Republic of China and provides fair trial rights – fair trial rights or the right to a fair trial is one of the most important fundamental human rights. It can be divided into several basic rules and guarantees. One aspect of the right to a fair trial is the presumption of innocence. Whether the presumption of innocence implicit contains the right to silence is controversial. Yet, the right to silence is recognized by the international community. The presumption of innocence is also deeply interwoven with the right against self-incrimination. However, institutional arrangements and forces in China’s criminal justice system heavily influenced the impact of legal reforms to the extent that the current ‘implementation gap’ is evident. With an inquisitorial system in criminal proceedings prevailing over centuries, the presumption of innocence and therefore the idea of the right to silence was alien to China’s legal system. Therefore, legal scholars are sceptical if a simple adoption of legal principles, which contradict with societal values in China or current conditions, is generally possible. The continuing widespread use of illegal methods to obtain confessions or testimonies of witnesses indicates that the police ignore rights of criminal suspects during interrogation. Due to a lack of a comprehensive system of evidence law, prosecutors still rely on confessions to generate convictions. To ensure the right to defence, the Chinese government enhanced the role of lawyers. In practice, however, the legal profession is still regarded as a weak institution compared to the more powerful investigation and prosecution authorities. By analysing dynamics of institutional forces and applicable legislation and conducting expert interviews, this dissertation thesis examines causes for the lack of implementation of legal provisions providing fair trial rights. Furthermore, this thesis attempts to draft an individual approach and possible solutions for the implementation of legal reforms in China.

 

 

Chinese Positions on the Use of Force by States

Andreas Lehrfeld

Project Associate, International Affairs Division, Stiftung Mercator, alehrfel(at)smail.uni-koeln.de

Abstract

In recent years, new and multifaceted challenges threatening regional and global security have emerged. The system of collective security with the UN Security Council at its core remains a permanent subject of criticism. Additionally, on-going violent breaches of regional and global peace by non-state actors not only means an immanent threat for the international community but also fuels the need for clarification by international law mechanisms. China’s state practice and theoretical positions of Chinese scholars on the use of force in international relations are the focus of this doctoral project. This includes topics such as the threat of using military force, the use of force by non-state actors and the issue of humanitarian intervention. Being a Permanent Member of the UN Security Council and one of the largest contributors to UN peacekeeping missions, the People’s Republic of China represents a major player in global security. Yet, while its economic outreach is high, China is far more cautious in allowing the use of force in international conflicts and rather refers to the pivotal pre-eminence of the principle of state sovereignty. Hence, as China’s rise affects the current US-led global order and poses a challenge for Western states, an in-depth understanding of Chinese positions on international law is vital. Facing an increasingly complex international security situation and China’s rising importance for global order, this doctoral project intends to close the academic void by contributing an analysis of Chinese positions on the use of force by states as an urgent issue in public international law.

 

 

Establishment of a Unified Property Management System in China – Possibilities and Limitations of Legal Transfers

Anna Sarah Malis

Research Assistant, Subject Group Non-European Languages, Cultures and Societies, amalis1(at)uni-koeln.de

Abstract

A specific feature of Chinese Law is the separation of land ownership and ownership in buildings and the registration of the rights relating to them at separate authorities. The missing connection of those authorities has led, for example, to multiple registrations of the same property or building, because the points of time of the registration often differ greatly. In order to implement an improved property protection, the real property law was adopted in 2007. The Chinese legislator heavily relied on the German legal systems while drafting this law. Furthermore English and US-American influences can be found. As the legislator chose to adopt rules and principles from different legal traditions, the real property law does not indicate clearly what kind of property registration system would be the most suitable one. By using the example of the unification of the register authorities in China, the study answers the question to what extent law from other jurisdictions can be transferred into Chinese law. Based on legal-historical observations, the German land registration system and thus the continental-European legal system may serve as a model of building a property registration system. However, the Chinese legislature could also use the Torrens-system for orientation, which is used, amongst others, in England and Australia. However, a more pluralistic approach to legal transfers could also lead to a model of its own kind.

 

 

Courts and the Public in China

Marco Otten

make.otten(at)googlemail.com

Abstract

Public participation in court trials acts as an important element of the justice system in many national legislations: Especially in the area of criminal law the public participates in the ruling of courts, for example as a jury. The courts on the other hand try to win the public over to their side, for example through public relations work. The description of the relationship of courts and public in China is the objective of this work. In a first step, the historical dimension of the topic will be examined: What was the role of the public in the justice system in the past, for example under the Qing dynasty, during the Republic of China or under Mao? Following this chapter, a closer look will be taken on the current situation of public participation in court trials, where different forms of participation are observable: The criminal procedure law requires witnesses to assist the authorities when enforcing the law. Other elements shaping the relationship between courts and public consist of participation in juvenile trials, where the principle of publicity generally does not apply due to the protection of minors. Local experiments with juries in court trials pose yet another research item in the dynamic field of public participation in the justice system. There are, however, other, arguably more informal channels the public can use to participate in court trials, e.g. petitions or pressure from the media. Lastly, the courts in China also take measures to influence the public opinion towards a more positive view when it comes to the justice system. By examining the relationship between courts and public the work aims to deliver another element to complete the picture of the environment Chinese courts exist in.

 

 

The Legal Framework for Skilled Migration to China

Eva Lena Richter 

eva.l.richter(at)web.de

Abstract 

Beginning with China’s accession to the WTO in 2001, the numbers of foreigners coming to China have risen. The scattered and rudimentary legal framework that dated back to the 1980s was increasingly seen as the major obstacle for controllable foreign immigration. The legal revision process started in 2012 with the adoption of a new Exit-Entry Law. Building on it, the Chinese government has revised many processes and regulations concerning foreigners’ stay and work conditions, starting with the new Exit-Entry Law and arriving at a categorisation approach towards foreign workers in 2016. One can expect further additions to the framework in the near future, most prominently a guiding catalogue for labour market demand concerning foreign migrants. The categorisation of foreign work migrants introduced in 2016 stresses attracting “highly skilled foreigners” while it aims to control “regular foreigners” and restricts entry and work of “low skilled foreigners“. As the legal framework evolves and the implementation proceeds, the complexity of the legal framework for foreigners wishing to or working in China increases since presently there are several different laws that govern foreign workers in China.

This dissertation project has the objective to present the current legal framework for skilled migration to China and its implementation, including different skilled migrant groups as well as general and specific regulations for them. By this, the dissertation project provides a concise overview of the legal regulations and laws concerning skilled migrants and shows how the implementation is progressing. Furthermore, it attempts to critically analyse the major profiteers as well as the losers of the new framework.

 

 

Judicial Control of Administrative Actions under the Revised Administrative Litigation Law in China

Nina Rotermund, M.A., LL.M., LL.M.

Research Fellow IN-EAST Institue of East Asian Studies, University Duisburg-Essen 

nina.rotermund(at)uni-due.de

Abstract

The Administrative Litigation Law (ALL) in China was revised in 2015 to strengthen claimants’ positions in relation to administrative agencies. The ALL gives citizens a remedy to sue the state, but ever since its initial enactment in 1990, an effective implementation has been impeded due to a weak position of Chinese judges being dependent on local governments in terms of salary, promotion, and budget. However, the new administrative litigation law seems promising as it provides some means of control for judges when dealing with local authorities. These means can be differentiated in those that affect the pre-trial phase of case registration and the trial process with the hearing as well as those that affect the post-trial phase of the enforcement of the verdict. For instance, at pre-trial stage, particularly, lower-level courts face external interference from local authorities. That is why, in the revised ALL, the authority of the middle-level courts was considerably broadened in first instance trials. At the trial stage, the new regulations now demand that the heads of the administrative departments attend the hearing. If they do not show up or if they interfere at the trial, the judge is free to publish the officials’ misbehaviour. This also applies if local authorities refuse to enforce the verdict. This thesis intends to analyze how Chinese judges make use of the means of control against administrative actions provided to them in the new ALL. It wants to answer whether the usage of more effective means, that cover the whole trial from case registration to verdict implementation, is likely to render judges more assertive against administrative actions of local authorities.

 

 

The Guiding Cases System of the Chinese Supreme People’s Court

Tao Yajun

Abstract

The guiding cases system was first brought up in the Second-Five Year Reform Programme for the People’s Court of 2005. It is aiming to “unify the legal applicable standards, to guide the work of lower courts, to enrich and develop legal theory”. Guiding cases are selected and edited by the Supreme People’s Court (SPC). They process a standard form, including title, keywords, main points of adjudication, related legal rules, basic facts of the case, results of adjudication and reasons for adjudication. According to the Notice of the Supreme People’s Court on Issuing the Provisions on Case Guidance of 2010, the lower courts shall consult the guiding cases when they decide the similar cases. Before the guiding cases system, the SPC has already used “typical cases” to emphasize its opinions on certain type of cases. Since 1985, the SPC has published cases on the Supreme People’s Court Gazette in order to introduce judicial work and legal system to the public. However, the SPC does not intend to vest binding effect de facto or de jure in typical cases. Although the SPC indicates that the guiding cases shall be consulted, the guiding cases have so far not come to the expectation of unifying the application of law. Due to a lack of supporting measures to carry out provisions of guiding cases system, many judges in lower courts do not use guiding cases to reach a verdict. The procedure of the adoption of guiding cases is different from the Anglo-american case law. The SPC establishes an office in charge of the guiding cases selection. The lower courts can also submit the recommendations of cases. Moreover, deputies of National People’s Congress (NPC), members of Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), experts, lawyers and others concerning the judicial issues can recommend cases to the original courts. All the selected guiding cases should be already legally effective judgement. In order to have a profound influence of the judicial practice, there should be a number of guiding cases covering various fields of law. Nevertheless, the reform of guiding cases still faces many resistances from different aspects. Unlike judicial interpretations, the SPC can directly release guiding cases without seeking for opinions of NPC, which can be considered as a threat to the legislator power. The dissertation thesis focuses on the development of the guiding cases system, its legal status in the Chinese legal system, the procedure for adopting guiding cases, the resistance to the guiding cases system reform, the implications for the politics of the SPC in relation to other state organs as well as the effects of guiding cases on the development of various fields of law.